Vet67to82's Blog : Presumption of guilt

Another new item contributing to today's meltdown :

" North Korean envoy warns war could erupt soon "

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6523NM20100603?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a49:g43:r1:c0.160000:b34592072:z0

.... former United States President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address on January 29, 2002 and often repeated throughout the rest of his stay in office, describing governments that he accused of helping terrorism and seeking weapons of mass destruction. President Bush named Iran, Iraq and North Korea as the axis of evil.

Now, evidence is conclusive that the ship was sunk by a N. Korean (DPRK) torpedo ... however, the presumption is that the torpedo was fired by a DPRK submarine ... whick the DPRK denies. The cash strapped DPRK is a weapons merchant to whomever is willing to buy and able to pay... As such, the DPRK, has sold torpedos to other countries ...

The smoking gun, who fired the torpedo, is the unanswered question.

May I suggest a better question; Does anyone else, having a DPRK torpedo and either submarines or modified surface ship launch capability with either a reason to fire at S. Korean military shipping ... or possibly a " diversion" ???

My suggestion, before going to war, is that the DPRK needs to present every bit of info on torpedoes sold and any serial numbers or other identifying marks that might help identify an alternative suspect.

... and why isn't anyone else suggesting that course of action?