Username Password
S&P 500: 1,317.11 Change: -0.21%
rjm77me
P&P Score: 99.94   Points: 616.65   Accuracy: 77.28%   Average Pick Score: 0.89   Annual Return: 32.85% (94.05% since 7/16/09)  

rjm77me's Blog : Extortion on Wall Street or Who is Right?

Date November 29, 2010  Edited: December 1, 2010    Comments Comments (1)    Rate this post Recommend This Post (118)   
Bookmark and Share
Abuse this post  Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Share ThisShare This
Orient Paper comments on conclusion of independent investigation

"In January of 2010, our company was visited by representatives of a research firm known as W.A.B. Capital, which is owned by Mr. Bill Block. The two representatives of W.A.B. Capital, Mr. Carson Block, who is Mr. Bill Block's son, and Mr. Sean Regan, toured our plant for less than an hour and then offered to publish a positive research report in exchange for a large sum of money and equity compensation. We refused their offer. The next we heard from these gentlemen was on June 28, 2010, when they published a 30 page report under the name of a new firm named Muddy Waters, LLC, alleging that our company was a fraud and that management had misappropriated investors' money...We said at that time that this report was categorically false and provided extensive documentation to prove this. However, Muddy Waters and their confederates ignored the evidence and continued to publish false and misleading information regarding our company in a reckless manner that appears to have been designed to enrich themselves and other unknown parties while disrupting the orderly trading in our stock," Mr. Liu continued.

For number of years companies like Moody and Fitch held banking system as hostage by trading false A plus grades for fees - Now this
FEC should get serious for a change.....................
Tags : ANP   MCO  

1 Comment(s):

Author rjm77me     Date November 29, 2010 12:05 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Summary for China Education Alliance (CEU by krisdale
Is Krisdale publishing for personal profits - have no cllue
http://kerrisdalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/CEU-Report-November-2010.pdf
In this report, we present compelling evidence that China Education
Alliance (CEU) is fabricating its SEC financial statements. We believe
that the company’s revenue and profit are highly overstated in its SEC
filings and that the company is mostly a hoax. Our evidence includes:
 The company’s websites do not work, despite the fact that CEU is
an online education provider and its websites are the company’s main
revenue-generating assets. We have recorded three videos here, here
and here which show that the main www.edu-chn.com and
www.pk1234567.com websites have non-functioning payment methods
and are full of broken links and HTML errors.
 The company’s websites receive a fraction of the visitor traffic
generated by comparable sites such as those operated by China
Distance Education Holdings (DL), which reports lower revenue and
lower margins than CEU despite having functioning websites, a larger
number of web assets, operational payment schemes and no broken
links on their sites.
 We hired an investigator to visit the company’s training center in
Harbin and found it to be barren of desks and teaching equipment. We
provide a video where we present a slideshow of the empty building.
We also explain why we are confident we visited the correct location.
 The company’s local filings to the Chinese government show that
the online business generated less than $1 million in revenue in 2008.
We provide SAIC filings from 2006, 2007 and 2008, including both
original Chinese photocopies as well as English translations.
 The company’s financials are not believable when compared to
publicly traded comparable companies. The company reports higher
margins and revenue growth when compared to DL, CEDU and CAST,
despite having a non-functioning website and an empty training center.
 CEU has had 4 low quality, non-reputable auditors since going
public in 2004. The company also raised capital in 2009 at an
irrationally low valuation without providing a sensible rationale for why
the capital was needed.
Want to comment on this post? Sign up now. It's FREE!
Already registered? Log In.
Sponsored Links