Username Password
S&P 500: 1,317.11 Change: -0.21%
MackTheKnife
P&P Score: 99.47   Points: 88.74   Accuracy: 74.06%   Average Pick Score: 1.50   Annual Return: 9.87% (41.70% since 3/6/08)  

MackTheKnife's Blog : SPX: The Trend Is Your Friend (or Foe)

Date June 30, 2010  Edited: July 1, 2010    Comments Comments (4)    Rate this post Recommend This Post (85)   
Bookmark and Share
Abuse this post  Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Share ThisShare This
One of the great pleasures of being an autodidact in the financial markets is that I get to reinvent the wheel, again and again and again.

In doing so here at the home office of the completely fictional Druids Investment Group -- Can You DIG It? -- I created the Big DIGgers' Market-Timing Model a few months ago. Since then, I have employed the BDMTM in my attempts to assess the long-, intermediate-, and short-term conditions of major equity-market indices, such as the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 (SPX); stock-market-sector proxies, such as the Materials Select Sector SPDR (XLB); and individual issues, such as E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (DD).

I mention the BDMTM in this blog post because of the change in the model's assessment of the S&P 500's long-term condition -- from Strong to Weak -- that became effective at the market close today.

Based on my interpretation of SPX data during the 60-plus years between 1950 and 2010, inclusive of today, a Strong condition in the index is strongly associated with positive returns and a Weak condition in the index is weakly associated with negative returns. Following are a few relevant data points:

-- The BDMTM module focused on the S&P 500's long-term waves identifies 24 discrete Strong periods, with 23 of them showing positive returns and one of them showing a negative return.

-- Regarding duration of the Strong periods, the median was 13.50 months, the mean was 14.67 months, and the standard deviation was 9.25 months. Also, the longest period was 40 months, and the shortest period was two months.

-- With respect to magnitude over the Strong periods, the median return was 23.30%, the mean return was 22.77%, and the standard deviation was 15.91%. In addition, the highest return was 55.08%, and the lowest return was -6.35%.

-- The BDMTM module focused on SPX's long-term waves also identifies 23 discrete Weak periods, with 11 of them showing positive returns and 12 of them showing negative returns.

-- Regarding duration of the Weak periods, the median was 13.00 months, the mean was 14.39 months, and the standard deviation was 5.26 months. Also, the longest period was 26 months, and the shortest period was six months.

-- With respect to magnitude over the Weak periods, the median return was -1.50%, the mean return was -2.48%, and the standard deviation was 22.46%. In addition, the highest return was 56.09%, and the lowest return was -43.67%.

As one who is neither a market permabear nor a market permabull parsing the data, I believe the trend is your friend -- or foe -- depending on the way(s) you position yourself in relation to it . . .
Tags : SPX   XLB   DD  

4 Comment(s):

Author InvestmentMAGE     Date August 4, 2010 09:31 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
FYI
Two Top Newsletters Bullish
Published August 3, 2010
Tags: Cabot Market Letter, Sound Advice
Two stock-investing newsletters with excellent long-term track records are sounding quite bullish, despite — or, perhaps more to the point, in part because of — the significant amount of fear that remains in the market.




http://theguruinvestor.com/
Author MackTheKnife     Date August 4, 2010 10:27 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Howdy, Mage!

Two Top Newsletters Bullish

Thanks for mentioning Peter Brimelow's article, which I first came across when it was originally published at MarketWatch Monday (http://tinyurl.com/38a2mr2).

Two stock-investing newsletters with excellent long-term track records are sounding quite bullish, despite — or, perhaps more to the point, in part because of — the significant amount of fear that remains in the market.

On the one hand, I am somewhat familiar with the Cabot Heritage Corp.'s constellation of newsletters; on the other hand, I am completely unfamiliar with Sound Advice. In both cases, however, their opinions have no bearing on the facts embodied in my data sets, which continue to guide my actions, both in real-world and virtual portfolios. Of course, the facts in my data sets will change in the future. And, of course, my interpretations of them may be erroneous at present.

But you pays your money, and you takes your chances. Which is OK by me . . .

Good luck!

MackTheKnife
Author InvestmentMAGE     Date August 6, 2010 10:02 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Hey Mack!

According to the FT today, retail investors are on strike. This, I believe, supports your thesis.


Good trading,
MAGE

Trading volumes retreat with investor trust http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5ac2207e-a0ae-11df-badd-00144feabdc0.html
Author MackTheKnife     Date August 6, 2010 10:23 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Howdy, Mage!

According to the FT today, retail investors are on strike. This, I believe, supports your thesis.

Thanks for mentioning the Financial Times article! Of course, I am too cheap to pony up for an FT.com subscription and thus am unable to gainfully employ the link you have kindly provided to the story, so I can only imagine the reasons cited by its author(s) for the perceived or real decline in investor trust recently (e.g., I obviously would consider the Flash Crash on May 6 as a possibly significant event in this context).

Good luck!

MackTheKnife
Want to comment on this post? Sign up now. It's FREE!
Already registered? Log In.
Sponsored Links