Username Password
S&P 500: 1,317.11 Change: -0.21%
DiviMo
P&P Score: 4.54   Points: -40.46   Accuracy: 59.17%   Average Pick Score: -0.45   Annual Return: -11.12% (-11.30% since 5/20/11)  

DiviMo's Blog : Robbing the Markets Blind on MCDONALDS

Date October 19, 2011  Edited: October 19, 2011    Comments Comments (5)    Rate this post Recommend This Post (49)   
Bookmark and Share
Abuse this post  Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Share ThisShare This

At 'Robbing the Markets Blind', it is not only a hope to give you precise high odds winning trading selections but JUST AS IMPORTANT our rational for making that trade.


While others on this site chatter in SILLY smak talk and slamming other members, our subscription service, "Robbing the Market  Blind" will be all business with information and selected picks that can MAKE YOU MONEY!


Today let's look at Big Mac "McDonalds" ..MCD.


First, I'm disclosing that I own MCD stock. However, our trade today involves writing (cash-secured or naked) PUTs on MCD. When you write a put, you receive the current premium immediately. The entity buying the PUT from you has  the option of putting the underlying stock to you to purchase at the assigned strike price. Hence, one always writes a put on a stock one doesn't mind owning if assigned.


Currently MCD is priced at 90.30 as this is being written.


 By looking at the chart and the technicals I  see that the $82.50 level has reasonable support as it rests. As well MCD Stock at $82.50 is below the 100 day moving average which McDonalds Stock has retested at least twice but perhaps three times in the last two months.


Also the 200 day moving average is just below the $82.50 strike. This  means that should MCD Stock decisively break the 100 day moving average this  could signal a change in trend, I will have the chance to buy back my $82.50 puts on McDonalds Stock and roll them lower. As long as I do not wait too long should the 100 day moving average break, then I will have time to roll down for a net credit on any roll.


Presently though, the strength in MCD Stock tells me that it is a good time to writing puts, albeit far out of the money and when possible, at the 200 day moving average. With the volatility high in the present market as investors fear  debt issues, the US slowdown in the economy, high unemployment, housing sales, and a number of other worries, put premiums in MCD Stock are excellent and make writing puts highly profitable even when doing so far out of the money.


MCD stock has had excellent support at the 82.50 - 83 price level during the last  few months of high volatility. With the current market strength this month, and the excellent results of MCD's earnings and dividend increases, one has high odds (excellent risk/reward ratio) of MCD not falling below 82.50 and if it did, one, as explained, can do an option roll-down.


Important is the RSI Indicator (Relative Strength Index) for McDonalds Stock. It remained fully positive on the big sell-off days.


Of interest was the MACD Indicator (moving average convergence divergence) when looking at the big sell-off days. The sell-offs produced just a mile negative amount and in each case  MCD Stock quickly recovered as did the MACD Indicator.  Important is the RSI Indicator (Relative Strength Index) for McDonalds Stock. It remained fully positive on the big sell-off days . The most important of the indicators was that MCD Stock failed to break the 100 day moving average.


So here's the trade.


WRITE MCD (cash-secured or naked) PUT on the DEC 82.50's for a premium of $91 per contract.


As of another option, if one wanted to take a more aggressive play with higher risk is to:


WRITE MCD (cash-secured or naked) PUT on the DEC 85's for a premium of $135.00 per contract.


 


Let me remind you when writing puts for income that stock selection is as critical as what strikes to select to sell. Writing puts for income is a strategy of small monthly gains


Final note: 'Robbing the Markets Blind' subscription info will be forthcoming. The information provided can come from our own analysis or those found on the internet that can provide a winning trade. We scan the internet for winners. Some of the information provided above came from our internet  friends. Posts via DIVIMO on this site document the other trade pick selections. Currently our documented picks are 100% winners. Disclosure: I own MCD stock.

Tags : MCD  

5 Comment(s):

Author JohntheWizard     Date October 19, 2011 17:56 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Mo,

When you look at a chart or at fundamentals of a stock, you always look at some parts of history. When you combine that with some forward looking information, you probably then make your picks based on how your judgment goes on that combined info.

So, intuitively and rationally, always based on historical info, you make your investment decisions.

My computer program tests the result of investment decisions by back testing. That is what your eye also does when it looks at the historical pattern of a chart or at the historical fundamentals or management guidance. Now suppose you have a certain portfolio of 20 stocks. For over 30 years this one has been making over 40%/year with a maximum drawdown only of -20%. Even this year you are already around 40%, right on track. However, it is only back testing, and never ever does historical performance hold any promise for the future. But, you know, when your eye sees such a straight line for 30 years, you get seduced into believing that this kind of past performance at least should continue for some time. What would you think? If I had a portfolio of 75 stocks having that historical behavior, would that influence your judgment?
Author MightyMo     Date October 20, 2011 11:49  Edited: October 20, 2011 by DiviMo Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
JTW,
First, imo, I don't consider this RW (research wizard) vs. RTMB (rob the markets blind). Nor is it human judgement vs. computerized program guidance.

In regard to your question: Of course, I would be highly interested in the portfolio stated.

Let me devulge a little on 'rob the markets blind' first. The moniker name provides a marketing attention-getter. The methodology/strategy actually is opportunitistic. It pertains to scanning, reviewing, researching for very high-probability winning trades. Likewise, RW, I would think.
Both look at historical data. RTMB centers on the belief that the market becomes irrational at times, providing winning opportunities. RTMB looks at patterns - seasonaility, charts, timeframes, dates. RTMB also looks at what I call 'Market Gifts'. This is one of the few articles I've written that has not been published. It is a list of 'events' that over the years I have accumulated that provides one a edge. An example would be 'old news'. Depending on the context I have found out that on-going repeats of specific bad news tends only to have a temporary effect on the overall market. Another example would be 'secondary offering'. Again, depending on the context, secondary offerings tend to only have a temporary negative effect on the underlying equity. RTMB also is broad base. It is not only my analysis that is used. We scan the internet for winning opportunites and used the ones that fix/concur with our blackbox. As such, I have no problem utilizing RW as a tool or opportunitistic selection picking.
In regard to RW, I'm not sure how you use it. I for one don't have the resources to own 75 stocks nor would I feel comfortable doing so. Nor would I want to do volume trading on a weekly basis. If I own those selections, I would probably break the rules during an elongated bear market where the equities are constantly dropping. I don't have the temperment to hold equities without some type of protection in case of a black swan or something along the lines of a 1987 crash.
My formulation of RTMB rooted from a change in methodology employed by me. During the Mar 2009 - Mar 2011 timeframe I used the strategy of momentum investing. My moniker - MightyMO - stems from two sources. The missouri river is called the 'mighty mo' by missourians. MightyMo also stands for Mighty Momentum. I was drawn to the precursor of this site - Zack's simulation stock game - when a member was publicized in the news as a winner utitlizing momentum strategies against the Investor's Daily top 50 or top 10.
Earlier this year, as was my opinion then, that the bull market was getting tired, I wanted to preserve my gains yet still obtain income via safe and conservative means. I called this my capital preservation with slow income gains strategy. In doing so, it become the root for my current methodology - RTMB. I found out that ongoing extensive review and research for high probability winning trades was and is a successful method as the market, imo, provides so many opportunities of this type in a number of venues.. I think unlike RW, I like owning historical large cap proven strong dividend stocks. My ideal equity would be a stock paying a 4-5% dividend that allows me to write options (covered calls or naked puts) which provides an additional 1% per month allowing somewhere along the lines of 16-17% gain per year (4-5% plus 12%). RW might identify equities that provide a much higher annualized gain but over many many years. The lean years would bother me (again my temperment). RTMB goes after opportunites as a whole that provide gains in a day to 3 month timeframe.

Someone once said, 'why get off a winning horse', In my opinion, I think I'm on one now and will be willing to share it with others beginning in 2012.
There's a lot more to comment on based on your questions. I might come up with a blog to continue this subject matter.

MO
Author JohntheWizard     Date October 20, 2011 13:49 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Mo,
Thanks for your elaborate and honest response. Let me think about it a little. I'll come back too it during the weekend.
John
Author TickerBandit     Date October 23, 2011 01:22 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
BLTB :-)
Author JohntheWizard     Date October 25, 2011 02:46 Abuse this post Report Abuse
Please report this as abuse only if you believe it violates People And Picks  Terms of Use
You must log in to send an abuse report.
Mo,
Investment schemes are usually judged by their longevity and robustness going through ups and downs in the market. When you would compare one set of rules that have proven to be profitable for three years with another set that proved to be profitable for 30 years, which one would you use?
Good investing and success with your new challenge,
John
Want to comment on this post? Sign up now. It's FREE!
Already registered? Log In.
Sponsored Links